Commentators attribute much of the blame for Republican climate denial to conservative news outlets like Fox News, 1 which have been found to disseminate misinformation on climate science. News media shape public attitudes on a variety of topics, and climate change is no different. To the extent that media framing plays an important role in fostering climate action in the public, these are welcome developments. News content is also more likely now than in the past to use language emphasizing risk and danger, and to use the present tense. ![]() At the same time, frames conducive to such engagement by the general public have been on the rise, such as those highlighting economic benefits of climate action. We find that many of the frames found to reduce people's propensity to support and engage in climate action have been on the decline in the mainstream media, such as frames emphasizing potential economic harms of climate mitigation policy or uncertainty. Specifically, we focus on three types of frames, based on previous research: economic costs and benefits associated with climate mitigation, appeals to conservative and free market values and principles, and uncertainties and risk surrounding climate change. the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, and the Associated Press- to illustrate the prevalence of different frames in the news coverage of climate change and their dynamics over time from the start of the climate change debate in 1988. In this paper we use a combination of automated and manual content analysis of the most influential media sources in the U.S. Yet, we don't have a clear understanding of how the content of this news coverage has changed over time, despite likely playing an important part in fostering or inhibiting public support and engagement in climate action. As climate change has risen in salience, the average American is much more likely to be exposed to news coverage now than in the past. The news media play an influential role in shaping public attitudes on a wide range of issues-climate change included. 3Department of Political Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.2Department of Political Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.1Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |